Kayla and Eric braved the cold to visit Lake of the Woods in Mahomet for their engagement photos.
This special couple are getting married this coming July.

Checking him out!

Beautiful couple

Visiting a covered bridge

Beautiful skies

Beautiful colors


Kayla and Eric braved the cold to visit Lake of the Woods in Mahomet for their engagement photos.
This special couple are getting married this coming July.

Checking him out!

Beautiful couple

Visiting a covered bridge

Beautiful skies

Beautiful colors



Top 5% of Wedding Photographers by WeddingWire.com
Anyone who knows me, knows that I’m not much on seeking awards and not much on seeking things like certificates.
It’s not my style. In fact, all the awards I’ve ever won as a photographer have come from either people or editors (yes, I realize what that means!) pushing me very hard to enter. And, make no mistakes, I’ve won with my photography.
But this is not why I got into photography and not why I continue to shoot.
What I’ve always considered my “award” or “reward” was knowing I made another person happy or smile. Maybe cry (tears of joy) or some type of good reaction. This more so with wedding photography than any other type of photography.
So needless to say, I was thrilled when we received an award from WeddingWire.com as one of the top five percent of wedding photographers out there.
I was thrilled because the award did not come from other photographers, editors or judges. It came from the brides and grooms we work with — the most important group out there when looking at wedding photography.
We want to thank our Brides and Grooms we have worked with — and the couples’ whose engagement photos we have shot.
We are so proud of our accomplishment — and inspired to try even harder. Afterall, we still have the top 1 percent to pursue!
Here are the contents of the press release we sent out earlier today.
Press Release
Clinton, Illinois – January 19, 2010- WeddingWire, the nation’s leading wedding technology company, just announced EMC Photography has been selected to receive the 2010 Bride’s Choice Awards™ for Wedding Photography!
The annual Bride’s Choice Awards™ recognizes and celebrates excellence in quality and service within the wedding industry, as determined by recent reviews and extensive surveys from over 500,000 newlyweds.
EMC Photography is among the top five percent of all vendors in the WeddingWire community, which includes over 100,000 wedding professionals across the US and Canada. Awards were given to winners across 19 different service categories, from wedding venues to wedding photographers.
“We are excited to recognize and honor the success of the top wedding professionals within the WeddingWire Community” said Timothy Chi, WeddingWire’s Chief Executive Officer. “The annual Bride’s Choice Awards™ program has given us the unique opportunity to highlight the best wedding professionals in each region as reviewed by brides and grooms who have utilized their services in the past year.”
We are happy to announce that EMC Photography is among the very best Wedding Photographers within the WeddingWire Network, which includes WeddingWire and Martha Stewart Weddings. We would like to thank our past newlyweds for nominating us for the 2010 Bride’s Choice Awards™.
For more information, please visit our WeddingWire Storefront today at WeddingWire for EMC Photography. You can also call us at 217-542-1602 and ask for Ed or Krystal for more info! Our region covers Clinton, Springfield, Champaign, Bloomington, Decatur, Peoria and surrounding communities.
The day started as beautiful but cold — and stayed that way the whole way.
But you never would have guessed that if you were with us at the gorgeous Chateau Hotel and Conference Center in Bloomington. We found ourselves spending a warm and cosy day working ourselves into our usual shooting frenzy on a wedding day.
Shooting our second wedding of the new year, we chronicled the day of Adrienne and Nicholas — a fabulous and fun couple. And met lots and lots of really cool people who were both family and friends of the newlyweds.
The day was the culmination of lots and lots of planning by Adrienne who found herself working without her groom — as he was away at US Army training! So, this date became even more special as he made it go right to get leave at the right time, not an easy task when part of the Armed Forces.
We are tossing up a few of the images from that day, please enjoy! We will have the full set of photos in about three weeks up and running.

Adrienne and Nicholas twirled their way through their first dance as a married couple at the Chateau Hotel and Conference Center in Bloomington, Illinois.

Nicholas gets a joyful and tearful hug from his new mom, Adrienne's mother, during the wedding ceremony.
Cold, oh yeah!
But, who cares when you have a couple getting married?
We ventured out for a New Year’s day wedding with a fantastic couple — Brooke and Matt — to the little villa of Farmer City, Illinois.
The couple, who leave near Weldon, hosted about 100 guests between their service at First Baptist Church of Farmer city and the Woodlawn Country Club. Even though temperatures were hovering in the teens (maybe colder) you could feel the warmth of their relationship. What we also very much appreciate it meeting lots of really nice people, family and friends, who attended the day’s celebration.
We will take a few weeks to get all the photos up and running, but I thought you might enjoy a bit of a preview.

Brooke's sons could not resist the urge to spend a few minutes playing hide and seek while waiting for the ceremony to begin at First Baptist Church in Farmer City, IllinoisBrooke and Matt had a few minutes free this fall during a wild harvest season (can anyone say lots and lots of rain) to get "framed" for their engagement photos.

Matt and Brooke pose outside (we were very quick!) at the Woodlawn Country Club in Farmer City, Illinois. They don't look too cold. . .

Okay, let's make this clear. No one can see what shoe's the bride is wearing. So, let's go for a bit of color and sparkly sneakers!
Buying a present of a camera – part 3
If you’ve gotten this far, cool! This is the longest of the group – but the best also!
We’re going to take a look at some camera features and who they work well with. And which features really aren’t very important. Now – I’m still not going to name cameras to choose. Read all the way to the end to find out why.
As I get into this, I realized one fundamental thing has changed in the photography/camera industry. And that is simply what is looked at as an advanced feature and what is viewed as a basic feature.
When you talk to anyone who has been in photography for more than ten years you’ll discover most talk about “basic” cameras and are referring to ones that are essentially non-automatic. In fact, students taking classes, like Richland Community College’s Black and White class, will still use a “basic” camera. No automatic features – you have to set everything yourself.
But in the digital age – these basic features are only available on the more advanced cameras. Seems a bit crazy, but if you find manual controls on a $100 camera they are completely buried in the complex menu system. If they exist at all! When you get up into the high stratosphere of cameras such as a Nikon D3x, the manual features are very easy to access.
Mid-level cameras, such as some of the Nikon d60s or d90s and Canon Rebels, have the manual controls visible but definitely not the featured items. I once had a student who had a fantastic camera that immediately gave her all kinds of access to all the manual functions. However, for her the correct camera would be one with NO manual features she could touch. It was not fantastic for her.
If the person you are buying a camera for knows photography and likes to experiment – go for the more expensive cameras. Make sure the manual functions or more advance override functions can be easily accessed.
Go in the exact opposite direction with someone who doesn’t know photography and only wants to shoot the occasional photo.
Do you want video? These days – most cameras have some feature to allow short videos to be shot. Some even allow audio. But, is the person likely to use it? Here’s the catch with almost any video out there, you still need the ability to edit the video to make it better. And is this person going to have the patience to learn it. I personally love video. But, I don’t use it very often.
What kind of lens do you want? Now, here is a good can of worms to get into. One of the catch phrases when buying a camera these days has to do with things like a 10x lens. What does that mean? Well, it means that the lens can zoom from a wide-angle to a telephotos. Make sure it is an optical zoom – not a digital zoom. An optical zoom means the lens moves and actually changes the size of the image. A digital zoom means all it does is crop in closer on the sensor. Digital zooms mean lower quality.
Now – if your gift recipient is one who loves photography, you will have to avoid the ultra small and small cameras. They don’t allow the background to go blurry in a photo so it looks better. There is a pure limitation imposed by physics. What I’m describing is called depth of field, which is how much of the image appears to be sharp and how much appears to be blurry.
If this person loves to shoot sports or portraits, you want them to get a camera that will actually permit them to have the background go blurry. How can you tell a camera will allow you this, you can’t from just the specs. But, almost any DSLR (digital SLR) allows this to occur somewhat easily. Plus, they have the option of getting other lenses that give them even greater control.
Now – final subject, what kind of camera to get? Frankly, I still refuse to answer the question easily. The biggest problem is that in looking at what are the traditional consumer point and shoot cameras you have new versions of a camera coming out about every six months. If not faster.
However, any of the national brands do a pretty good job. Nikon, Canon, Olympus, Sony, GE and many others. And if you buy from a retailer that sells training, get it for the person on that camera!
I teach digital photography and digital photography seminars. But, I can’t teach someone how to use their specific camera in those seminars. Not enough time and too many models.
And – pay for the extended warranty on these gadgets if you can. I’m not a fan of those, but I also know that there is essentially nothing that is fixable in most point and shoot cameras. It becomes a replacement issue. After all, no company is going to pay a tech $35 an hour to fix a $100 camera. It ends up costing more than replacing the camera.
And they do break!
So, here’s the breakdown of recommendations (we’re looking at body only prices as some kits will boost the price of an amateur camera to another range:
Hi-level Professional Cameras (more than $3,000) – this is not a present unless the person has asked you for it or has said that this is what they need. These cameras will overwhelm most users completely. Buying one will NOT improve someone’s photography skill unless they are already skilled to begin with. There is a reason they are called “professional.”
Mid-level Semi-Pro Cameras ($1,800 to $3,000) – this is also not a very good present unless the person has mentioned to you that they are looking at this camera or need one. Again, these cameras will NOT improve someone’s photography skill unless they are already somewhat skilled to begin with. Again, there is a reason they are called Semi-Pro.
Advanced amateur ($1000 to 1,800) – As long as the person is willing to learn and really knows photography, good choices. The cameras have plenty of automatic features, have all the advanced sensors of their more expensive cousins and are very capable of capturing fantastic images. They are also capable of handling many manual features that allow a photographer fantastic control.
Amateur ($500 to $1000) See the comments above as that well describes many of these cameras. Be prepared to sacrifice a bit on the features as these cameras tend to be more automatic models and not manual models. The sensors are more variable in quality than the above group, but still tend to be very good. This is a good range for someone who knows or has begun to discover what is possible and wants to learn more.
Point-n-shoot: ($300 to $500) These sometimes look like digital SLRs but do not have interchangeable lenses. Huge variation in available features and you have to do a bit of searching. These are starting to get into smaller cameras but with many overrides on the automatic features. Usually equipped with very high quality optics and good sensors.
Point-n-shoot ($150 to 300) These are mostly automatic cameras for almost all users. They might have manual overrides, but these are well-hidden in the menus and are not user-friendly. Reasonably good optics and sensors – lots of automatic features allow users to get pretty good results.
Under $150: Pocket-size, automatic cameras. Good for getting candids, not for any type of action photography. Manual features usually not available at all. Good for total amateurs or those who don’t want to learn more than pushing a button.
Now – armed with these categories, visit www.cnet.com, www.wired.com, www.consumerreports.com, or many other sites that list and rate cameras. Read advice, read opinions and then figure out which one you really want to give (or even get for yourself.)
Remember, it’s all about making the recipient happy with the gift and not how much you spent on it.
Buying a present of a camera – part 2
I have to start off with a myth that really needs to be addressed – and I’m going to put some links at the bottom of this that you can check out for more information if you so desire. It has been coined as “the megapixel myth.”
All you need to do for the past few years is pick up any ads from Best Buy, Office Depot, Staples, Walmart, Sears and so forth and you’ll discover that what you need more than anything else is a lot of megapixels. It used to be 3.2, then 5, 8, 10, 14! The implication is the more you have, the better the camera.
And it’s not true.
There are a number of factors that enter into making one camera better than another – but that is a bit hard to sell easily. The advertising gurus like simple – after all, everyone knows that the bottle of laundry soap you are buying is better just because it now says Improved!
Megapixels are important. But, what the heck is a megapixel? Well, a pixel is a picture element – it is the small particle of information captured by the camera. So a camera that can capture 12 megapixels is capturing 12 million pieces of information. Pretty impressive. But, what manufactures don’t define is what the megapixel really is.
Honestly, if you received a letter telling you that you had one 12 million in money, you might be excited. However, if you then discovered the 12 million was pesos and not dollars, your excitement might go down.
It’s not just the number, but the quality of the pixel that has to be viewed. Larger sensors actually capture a better pixel – better, more accurate color. And – I hate to say this – the sensors of three years ago don’t do as good of a job as the ones today. But there is another factor that has entered in.
Manufacturers are still pressing for smaller and smaller cameras. A sensor from today that can capture 12 million pixels might actually be smaller than one that captured 6 million five years ago. But that very shrinking in size can hurt the quality of the image. One of the side effects of some of these sensors is cameras have become less sensitive to light.
They don’t work as well in dark conditions as the older cameras did. A couple of relatives we have brought this up as a problem – as their old cameras seemed to do a better job in low light.
IN some cases, the smaller sensors may produce not only more pixels but increase the amount of noise in the final image. Hmmm. Isn’t that what we were trying to leave behind? More noise equals a lower quality image.
It’s true. Megapixels are just not created equal. This is one of the reasons a pro gets a better image at 6 megapixels than a person with a point-n-shoot gets at 12 megapixels. And at a lower light level.
So – where does this leave you? And your search for your brother’s new camera?
Don’t pay attention to the megapixels – pay more attention to the ISO range on the camera (does it go up to at least 800 or a 1000? When you set the camera defaults, what is the ISO?) How big is the sensor – ask to either see the manual or pull up the website of whatever store you are at, this has been listed in the specs for every camera I’ve ever been asked about.
And – keep in mind – get the camera that is appropriate to the person. The more expensive cameras will have more advanced features – but what’s the point of advanced features if your favorite person will never understand them or be able to use them.
One last thing – in the same area – you don’t need the millions of megapixels if you don’t plan to print any larger than a standard print. Or maybe a 5 x 7. Many references exist for this – but generally accepted is a good print as a 5 x 7 needs four megapixels. The rest – as the image is printed the rest of the info is thrown away. Not used.
But, computer manufacturers love these new cameras. You need more memory and faster machines to handle the extra large photos. More business for them!
Wait for the next blog (couple of days!) and we’ll wrap this up. Just in time for Christmas!
Buying a digital camera as a present – part 1
As a professional photographer and educator, I always get questioned on what camera I recommend. During this time of the year, the question arises even more often.
I’ve spent many years dodging the question – with the statement of “that depends” followed by saying I don’t know enough about lower price models to be a good judge.
But after having taught as many students as I have both in classes and in seminars – I think it’s about time that I come up with a better answer.
Unfortunately, the answer to the question means other questions must be asked. And even though answering a question with another question is considered a bit rude, I have to ask “who is getting the camera?”
Cameras are like shoes, you won’t wear the same shoes climbing Mount Everest as you would attending a formal ballroom dance. You need appropriate shoes AND ensure they fit you correctly. Why anyone would think that one camera is “the best” is silly.
This also means that I still won’t answer the question directly – but I’m going to give you some working guidelines today and follow it up with some more specific tips in the next few blogs.
And keep in mind – this means you actually have to find something that fits the person getting the camera. No laziness allowed. Which means this is all about them and not you.
So . . .
Let’s take a look at these one by one (or maybe a bit faster)
Regardless of what a salesperson might say, if you are spending more than $150 on a camera you really should have some concept of photography. Not because you plan to make a career of it, but because you will have to understand all the features that come with the camera. Five years ago $150 would not buy you much feature-wise. Now, you can get so lost in the camera features that you forget to take the picture!
Don’t expect the user’s manuals to be of any real help in learning the cameras. I’ve long since discovered that users just plain don’t get what the manual is talking about. Manuals, almost without fail, assume the person who now owns the camera understands words like exposure, white balance, bracketing, etc.
Sales people are generally not much more useful . I once even overheard a sales person telling a person that bracketing means the camera automatically shoots three photos at different white balances and then chose the best exposure from the three. The customer just nodded. I was a bit preoccupied at the time, so I’ve always wondered if the customer was nodding to humor the salesperson or actually believing it.
Just so you know, bracketing means you have the camera intentionally take one picture at what it thinks is correct and then intentionally shoots two more images, one that is overexposed and one that is underexposed. You can have a different type of bracketing that also involves white balance. But, the two are not related and the camera definitely does not choose the “correct” exposure.
This actually leads to question 2, do they understand technology? Are they willing to learn technology? You definitely don’t need an engineering degree to understand a camera – but you have to have the patience to learn it.
If you know the person can’t program their DVR, then don’t be mean to them and give them something far more complicated. They’ll get frustrated and end up blaming the camera for being a bad camera. And it probably isn’t. Most technological problems arise from the user and not the machine. Yeah, no one wants to hear that line.
Next question – do they know computers? You see, digital cameras and their products are designed to be used with computers. This has been known to shock some of my seminar students.
And if you buy a camera for someone who thinks their computer can blow up the world (Yes!! There are still some people who think that!) don’t expect them to jump up and down about the concept of editing their photos, downloading, uploading, posting photos, etc. If they are having problems mastering email . . . .
Now – if you’ve gotten through all of that, well, does the person who actually like to shoot photos? Look at their walls of their home – are there pictures there? How big or small are they? Do you see any albums? Do they give away photos? Some people think that art on the wall means a painting of someone else’s family or a few weeds strategically placed.
I know several people who have great cameras but don’t use them. No real interest. Or they hide their photos, perhaps thinking they might run away if left in the open. . .
That does not mean you don’t get them a camera – just don’t get the latest, greatest $800 camera out there. They would probably be happy with one costing less than $100 that doesn’t do everything.
Now, as to where they might go with the camera. If you want a camera to go almost everywhere with you, you probably don’t want a digital SLR. They’re just too bulky. Now, they will produce the best images (and we’ll address why in a later blog) but if you want something portable it’s just not a good idea.
Even when working as a news photographer I did not continuously carry a camera on my person. I have to confess, my dates had no clue that I had a full camera bag in my trunk on the off chance that a disaster might occur near me that I would shoot.
On the other hand, I would have loved to have a small digital camera with me at other times.
Finally – and I probably should have put this one as the first – are they willing and interested in learning more? They have to be willing to learn . . . they have to be willing to experience new things. Age is not a barrier at all – I’ve had students from ten years old to 75 years old.
Don’t ever assume they will want to learn . . . there are those who don’t really want to learn. Or think they can’t.
Get them a set of disposable film cameras and they might be just as happy.
In the next couple of blogs, we’ll take a better look at other camera details that will help you decide what you need to get them and why
So, my answer to question of what is the best camera is still – it depends, but I think I’ll now begin to say it depends on who the camera is for and what they will do with it.
That sounds a bit better.
We’re going to try something a bit different this coming October 11 (a Sunday) when we work with an organization to raise money for breast cancer research.
And our goal is to be exhausted by the end of the day. We are taking appointments for Family Portrait sessions on that day and then donating the entire proceeds of the session fee to breast cancer research.
If you want to know more about who we are working with, check out the following link Images for a Cure. We know of only one other area photographer participating as I write this blog, hopefully there will be more in the near future.
There are hundreds of photographers who have signed up nationwide and we are proud to be a part of that group. Krystal has an aunt who survived breast cancer and losing her would have been horrible. She has been there for us many times and we want to do something to help see that the threat that loomed before her does not loom before anyone else.
Please call us or email us and set up a time to not only get a family heirloom created, but to make a fantastic donation to a fantastic group of people. As a bonus, we’ll discount our canvas wrap prints for you from that day’s shoots. We are located in Clinton, but as we are on-location photographers we will travel. We only have a limited number of session available so don’t wait too long to contact us.
We can be reached by phone at 217-542-1602 or at www.edvydasphoto.com.
Click here for more info
Wow!!!!
I looked out onto a classroom that was completely full today! It seemed like every seat was filled and that is absolutely thrilling to be an instructor when that happens.
If you are wondering what I am babbling about – along with our business I also teach at Richland Community College in Decatur, Illinois. This is my fourth year as an adjunct (that means part-time in college-speak) faculty member.
I am so excited abo
ut this semester coming up that I can barely hold myself together. The world of digital photography continues to change so fast and so wildly that it is hard to keep up – and I have to say, when you teach photography it forces you to keep up!
When I started four years ago Photoshop CS2 was the modern program – and now we are on Photoshop CS4. No one had even heard of what has become an industry standard, Photoshop Lightroom. Cameras were topping out at 6 mB. And who would have even begun to think that digital SLRs would be producing videos that rival cameras that costs thousands more? And that just scratches the surface.
But – one of the coolest things about all this technology and all these advances, all they do is allow a photographer to do a better job faster. I don’t think there will ever come a time when photographers are not part our lives. No matter the advances of camera, it still takes a human to create an image.
I have yet to see a camera that captures the quality of the light (as I heard my friend Bob Davis say more than a few times this summer) without a photographer first seeing or creating it. Nor have I ever seen a camera pose a person so they look thin or eliminate that horrible double-chin. And lots of other things.
I have the perfect image that I’ve posted with this blog to talk about the quality of light as this gorgeous couple I shot in Bel Air, Maryland illustrates. Cool – and they were fun to work with to boot!
If I ever get a camera that can do this without my input, well, I can hang up my Nikons and fade into the sunset.
And I look forward to working with this newest crop of budding photographers on just this kind of an adventure.
Now – if only I had actually taken a photo of that classroom today! Maybe for the next post…
We had a great time south of Champaign with one of our wedding couples and their families, with their help we turned their two car garage into a 14 seat viewing area to see their photographs projected on the wall. It was a great time, and seeing the kids see themselves on the ‘big’ screen was great!